Read Time: 03 minutes

Synopsis

The Court of Sessions Judge Priti Kumar Ghule in Mumbai has recently rejected the plea filed by lyricist Javed Akhtar against the order of the Magistrate summoning him in a criminal defamation case for his remarks against RSS comparing it with the Taliban.

The sessions judge said that the order passed by the magistrate summoning Akhtar was legally sound.

A detailed order is awaited.

In October 2021, the Magistrate Court issued summons to Javed Akhtar after a complaint was filed by Advocate Santosh Dubey under Section 499 and Section 500 of IPC.

After recording the statement of two witnesses under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the magistrate issued summons to Javed Akhtar in December 2022.

Subsequently, Akhtar filed a criminal revision against the summons issued to him through Advocate Jay K Bhardwaj before the Mumbai Sessions Court on the grounds that the summons was issued without an inquiry.

In his plea, Javed Akhtar stated that the summons issued to him were motivated and targeted. The plea read,

“Ld. Magistrate failed to appreciate that the entire litigation initiated at the behest of Respondent No. 2 is ill motivated and targeted at garnering 'reflective glory. Apart from this, the extortive intent of Respondent No. 2 can be easily deciphered from the legal notice wherein Respondent No. 2 claimed Rs. 100 Crores as damages/compensation. That even otherwise, a bare perusal of the impugned order would establish this beyond all reasonable doubts that the said order is cryptic, non-reasoned and mechanical in nature, passed in haste without considering the surrounding circumstances and the settled position of law.”