Sikh Remarks| Allahabad HC Dismisses Rahul Gandhi’s plea against Varanasi court order
In 2024, Gandhi allegedly made an objectionable statement during his US visit, asserting that there was an atmosphere of insecurity among Sikhs in India
The Allahabad High Court, on Friday, dismissed the plea filed by Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi challenging an order of the Varanasi MP/MLA Sessions Court that directed the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) court to re-examine a plea seeking registration of a First Information Report (FIR) against him for remarks made during a 2024 visit to the United States concerning the Sikh community.
The case arose after Varanasi resident Nageshwar Mishra filed an application with the ACJM court seeking to register an FIR, claiming that Gandhi’s statement where he allegedly remarked that the environment in India was "not good for Sikhs" was provocative and divisive. He alleged that Gandhi had falsely claimed Sikhs in India feel unsafe and are not allowed to wear turbans or visit gurdwara, comments which, according to Mishra, could provoke communal unrest.
ACJM initially rejected the plea in November 2024, citing a lack of jurisdiction, as the alleged incident took place outside India. Undeterred, Mishra filed a revision petition before the Varanasi MP-MLA court, which upheld his plea on July 21, 2025, and instructed the ACJM to reconsider.
Special Sessions Judge (MP-MLA court) Yajurveda Vikram Singh allowed Mishra’s revision plea, observing that the additional chief judicial magistrate (ACJM) had prematurely dismissed the case on November 28, 2024. Court then directed that the complaint be reconsidered and proceeded with as per law.
However, Gandhi filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court.
Rahul Gandhi’s US remarks had triggered controversy last year, after he claimed that Sikhs in India live under an atmosphere of insecurity. Mishra, in response, filed a petition arguing the comment was part of a larger conspiracy to trigger a ‘civil war’. Case Title: Rahul Gandhi vs State of UP and Another