2020 Delhi Riots: SC Adjourns Bail Pleas of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and Others to Sept 22

All the 5 UAPA accused have filed SLPs before the Supreme Court challenging the Delhi High Court's September 2 order denying bail to them the 2020 Delhi Riots larger conspiracy case

Update: 2025-09-19 05:26 GMT

Supreme Court to hear bail petitions for Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and others accused in the Delhi riots conspiracy case on September 22

The Supreme Court has listed for hearing on September 22, the bail pleas filed by Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, along with Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider and Shifa-Ur-Rehman , all accused under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act in connection with the 2020 Delhi riots larger conspiracy case.

The Bench of Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice Manmohan will take up the petitions on Monday i.e. September 22.

All the five UAPA Accused have filed a Special Leave petition (SLP) before the Apex Court challenging the Delhi High Court's September 2, order denying bail to them.

The High Court had held “violence in the name of protest is not free speech” as it dismissed the bail pleas of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and seven others. A Division Bench of the High Court, in a detailed 133-page verdict had said,“Any conspiratorial violence under the garb of protests or demonstrations by the citizens cannot be permitted. Such actions must be regulated and checked by the State Machinery, as they do not fall within the ambit of the Freedom of Speech, Expression, and Association.”

It had held that the role of Sharjeel Imam and Umar Khalid is prima facie grave in the entire conspiracy, noting that they had delivered inflammatory speeches on communal lines to instigate a mass mobilization of members of the Muslim community. The plea of parity with co-accused was also rejected. The judges had said that although others were present in conspiratorial meetings and WhatsApp groups, their role was “limited when juxtaposed with these Appellants.”

Notably on July 9, 2025, the High Court had reserved its verdict after briefly hearing submissions from the prosecution as well as from counsels representing the accused persons, namely Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Mohd. Saleem Khan, Shifa-ur-Rehman, Athar Khan, Khalid Saifi, Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, and Shadab.

The case stems from the violence that erupted in Northeast Delhi in 2020 during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). The clashes between supporters and opponents of the Act led to large-scale incidents of stone-pelting, arson, and violence, leaving 53 people dead and injuring thousands.

Imam’s bail plea, had been rejected by ASJ Sameer Bajpai on February 11, 2022, observing that his speeches were intended to create “public disorder” and “incitement to violence” while also appearing to challenge the territorial integrity and sovereignty of India. The Supreme Court had more recently refused to entertain Imam’s Article 32 petition, noting that he could not have approached the top court while his bail plea was pending before the High Court.

Previously, the Supreme Court had also refused to entertain an Article 32 petition filed by Fatima who had submitted before Court that she had been in jail for 4 years while her bail application has been pending for last 2 and a half years. As per the ASJ Amitabh Rawat's order of March 17, 2022 whereby it had rejected Gulfisha’s bail, Court had found that Gulfisha was present in North East Delhi at the time of the riots and as per witness statements, she was the one who started the blockade and prompted an attack on police personnel and others with weapons like dande, Lal-mirch powder and others in Jafrabad area which had a "cascading effect leading to riots". As per the trial court's order, Gulfisha was also present at a midnight secret meeting on 16/17.02.2020 at Chand Bagh for chakkajam. She was also involved in the incident of 22.02.2020 at Jafrabad Metro Station.

Details of Arrest and Charges against each of the accused:

1. Umar Khalid: He is one of the most prominent accused named in FIR 59/2020. The charges allege he was a central conspirator who, through public addresses and online communications, helped plan and radicalise protests that the police say culminated in the northeast-Delhi violence; he is charged under the UAPA and multiple IPC and Arms Act provisions.

2. Sharjeel Imam: He was arrested in early 2020 and subsequently placed on the chargesheet in the larger conspiracy case. Police allege his speeches and messages played a role in mobilising protests that, the state says, escalated into organised violence; he is accused under the UAPA and various IPC provisions connected to incitement and conspiracy.

3. Gulfisha Fatima: Arrested 9 April 2020, she was later named in the Delhi Police’s consolidated “larger conspiracy” FIR (commonly referred to as FIR 59/2020). The charges include offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and multiple Indian Penal Code counts linked to rioting, conspiracy and violence; the police also invoke provisions of the Arms Act in related entries.

4. Meeran Haider: Arrested on 1 April 2020, Haider is accused as a mobiliser named in the larger conspiracy FIR. Police allege he organised and directed protest activity that, according to the chargesheet, contributed to planned violence; his name appears under UAPA counts alongside IPC offences related to rioting and public disorder.

5. Shifa-Ur- Rehman: Rehman, President of Jamia Millia Islamia Alumni Association, is accused in the case of financing and sustaining anti-CAA protest sites, routing about Rs. 8.9 lakh with fake bills, and using women and children to shield protest venues. Police allege he conspired with others to escalate protests into riots under the garb of dissent.

Case Title: Gulfisha Fatima v. State of NCT of Delhi and connected matters

Hearing Date: September 19, 2025

Bench: Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice Manmohan

2020 Delhi Riots: SC Adjourns Bail Pleas of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and Others to Sept 22

All the 5 UAPA accused have filed SLPs before the Supreme Court challenging the Delhi High Court's September 2 order denying bail to them the 2020 Delhi Riots larger conspiracy case

Similar News

Plea to Curb Ill-Treatment of Lawyers and Litigants: CJI Agrees to hear on Oct 6

Can a Court Order a Bank to Grant a One Time Settlement (OTS)? Supreme Court Clarifies

Supreme Court Grants Bail, Suspends Life Term of Catholic Priest Convicted for Raping Minor Girl

SC refuses plea alleging Custodial Torture by Gujarat Police of 17 yr old laborer

CJI Misquoted on Khajuraho Idol: SG Tushar Mehta, Justice Chandran Warn Against Social Media Distortion

Touching Minor’s Private Parts Not Rape or Penetrative Sexual Assault: SC

Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe Into Advocate’s Alleged Fake B.Com Degree

CJI Gavai clarifies his remarks in Khajuraho Vishnu Idol case, says "I respect all religions"

Anand Karaj Marriages: Supreme Court Orders All States to Frame Rules within 4 Months

'Devotees don't give money to temples for marriage halls': SC refuses to stay Madras HC order

Justice Surya Kant: Law Schools Must Leave ‘Ivory Towers’ and Serve Real Social Struggles