Forged Birth Certificate: Supreme Court seeks UP govt's reply on pleas of Azam Khan's wife, son

The case originated from a December 2018 FIR lodged at Rampur’s Ganj police station on the complaint of BJP leader Akash Saxena, alleging that Azam Khan and his wife procured two separate birth certificates for their son

Update: 2025-09-27 09:58 GMT

SC issues notice to UP government on pleas by Tazeen Fatma and Abdullah Azam Khan

The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to the Uttar Pradesh government on separate pleas filed by Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan’s wife, Tazeen Fatma, and son, Abdullah Azam Khan, seeking suspension of their conviction in the alleged forged birth certificate case.

The Bench of Chief Justice B R Gavai, Justices Satish Chandra Sharma and K Vinod Chandran, while hearing the matter, asked Advocate Nizam Pasha, counsel for the petitioners, to clarify how the apex court could stay the conviction.

“The stay of conviction has to be done in rare cases. Usually, it is the suspension of sentence that is granted,” CJI Gavai observed.

The pleas challenge the Allahabad High Court’s October 2023 order that had suspended the sentence imposed by a Rampur trial court but refused to stay the conviction. This refusal effectively upheld their disqualification under Section 8(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which bars convicted persons from contesting elections.

Fatma and Abdullah Azam argued that the refusal has caused “far-reaching and irreversible consequences” for their political careers and public standing. They termed the high court’s reasoning “erroneous and unsustainable,” pointing out that the court itself had noted the absence of material evidence proving forgery in the 2015 birth certificate issued by the Lucknow Municipal Corporation.

The case originated from a December 2018 FIR lodged at Rampur’s Ganj police station on the complaint of BJP leader Akash Saxena, alleging that Azam Khan and his wife procured two separate birth certificates for their son.

The first certificate, issued in 2012 by the Rampur Municipal Corporation, listed Rampur as the place of birth based on affidavits by the parents. The second, issued in 2015 by the Lucknow Municipal Corporation, cited hospital records from Queen Mary’s Hospital, Lucknow, listing Lucknow as the place of birth.

A chargesheet was filed in April 2019 under Sections 420, 467, 468, and 471 IPC, followed by a supplementary chargesheet under Section 120-B IPC in 2021. The Rampur trial court convicted Fatma, Azam Khan, and Abdullah Azam in October 2023, sentencing them under various provisions.

Their appeals remain pending, but the conviction continues to bar Fatma from contesting elections or holding trust positions.

In a related news, in May, the Allahabad High Court had granted relief to Azam Khan in the fake birth certificate case by staying his conviction. However, the court did not stay the conviction of his wife, Tanzeen Fatima, and son, Abdullah Azam, though their pleas for suspension of sentence were allowed and they were granted bail.

In July 2022, the Supreme Court had dismissed a plea filed by Azam Khan seeking direction to quash the charge sheet in the matter. The Trial Court / Special Judge (MP/MLA), ACJM-I, Rampur sentenced all three to seven years in prison for forgery, among other sentences on October 18, 2023.

In related news, in July, the Supreme Court dismissed a plea filed by Azam Khan seeking transfer of his ongoing hate speech trial from Uttar Pradesh to Delhi. Khan had alleged tampering of court records and expressed apprehensions over receiving a fair trial in the state.

The Apex Court, on February 10, 2025, granted bail to Azam Khan, along with his son, Mohammed Abdullah Azam Khan in a case relating to machine theft. "Taking into considering the period of incarceration undergone by the appellants, and that the chargesheet has already been filed, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order and grant bail to the appellants. Accordingly, the appellants are granted bail, subject to the terms and conditions which are to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, " the court had then said.

Case Title: Dr. Tazeen Fatma v. State of UP and connected matter

Order Date: September 26, 2025

Bench: Chief Justice B R Gavai, Justices Satish Chandra Sharma, K Vinod Chandran

Tags:    

Similar News