Kerala VC Appointment Deadlock Ends: Supreme Court Hails ‘Happy Ending’, Keeps Legal Issues Open

Supreme Court recorded that the long-running deadlock between the Kerala Governor and the State Government over Vice-Chancellor appointments had been resolved. It clarified that all questions of law arising from the dispute have been kept open for future adjudication

Update: 2025-12-18 05:42 GMT

SC records resolution of Kerala Vice-Chancellor appointment deadlock after intervention by Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia

The Supreme Court on Thursday continued hearing the long-running dispute over the appointment of regular Vice-Chancellors in two state universities in Kerala; APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University and the University of Digital Sciences, Innovation and Technology, and recorded that the impasse between the Governor and the State Government has now been resolved.

The Bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan noted that the appointments have finally been made following the Court’s intervention, bringing to an end a prolonged stalemate that had left both universities without permanent Vice-Chancellors.


The controversy arose due to differences between the Kerala Governor, in his capacity as Chancellor, and the State Government over the appointment process. In view of the deadlock, the Supreme Court had earlier appointed Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia to shortlist names for the Vice-Chancellor posts to break the impasse.

During the hearing, the Attorney General, appearing for the Governor, informed the Court that the matter had been resolved and that the development had been duly communicated to Justice Dhulia.

Senior Advocate Jaideep Gupta, appearing for the State of Kerala, submitted that an appointment order should not have been issued while the matter was still pending before the Court. He pointed out that an affidavit had been filed by the State and sought time to respond.

Justice Pardiwala, however, observed that the Court’s primary concern had always been to ensure that appointments were made. “Our concern was that the appointments must be made,” he said, adding that the objective was to ensure that the selected candidates were meritorious.

When Gupta reiterated that the main legal issues were still pending, the Bench responded that those questions would remain open for consideration. “Let’s put an end to this. We have to make sure that they are meritorious,” Justice Pardiwala remarked.

Referring to the Court’s earlier order dated December 11, Justice Pardiwala recalled that the Bench had noted positive developments and emphasised that timely and decisive judicial intervention can go a long way in protecting the rights of citizens. He observed that both universities had remained “rudderless” for a prolonged period due to the lack of consensus between the Governor and the State Government, prompting the Court to step in.

The judge noted that Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia was entrusted with the task of recommending at least three names for the Vice-Chancellor posts. “Today, we are happy that the Chancellor and the Government, in one voice, have reported that the appointment of the Vice-Chancellors has been made,” he said.

The Bench placed its appreciation on record for Justice Dhulia’s role and thanked the authorities for acting in aid of the Court. It also appreciated the assistance rendered by the Attorney General, Senior Advocate Jaideep Gupta and their respective teams, remarking that the matter had reached a “very happy ending”.

The Court clarified that all questions of law arising from the dispute have been kept open for future adjudication.

On December 11, the Court had observed that despite repeated directions, the Governor, who is also the Chancellor, and the Chief Minister have failed to reach a consensus on selecting a Vice Chancellor for the two universities. Earlier, it had indicated that it would intervene and make appointments itself if the Kerala Government and the Governor do not resolve their ongoing deadlock

Notably, on November 27, the Kerala Governor has approached the Supreme Court alleging that the Chief Minister forwarded only “incomplete records” relating to the appointment of Vice Chancellors for APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University and the Kerala University of Digital Sciences, Innovation and Technology, making it impossible for him to act on the recommendations of the Justice (retired) Sudhanshu Dhulia Committee. The Court had strongly criticised the Kerala Governor for holding up action on the report submitted by Justice Dhulia regarding the appointments of Vice Chancellors.

Previously in September, the AGI had mentioned before the Court an application filed by Kerala Governor Rajendra Arlekar seeking the removal of the Kerala Chief Minister from the Committee constituted for appointing regular Vice Chancellors of APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University and the University of Digital Sciences Innovation and Technology.

On August 18, the Apex Court had appointed former judge of the Court, Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, as the Chairperson of the Search and Selection Committee to appoint Vice Chancellors for two universities in Kerala; APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University and Kerala University of Digital Sciences, Innovation and Technology.

Case Title: The Chancellor, APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University v. State of Kerala & Ors.

Hearing date: December 18, 2025

Bench: Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice KV Viswanathan
Tags:    

Similar News