Supreme Court of India backs exam authorities and validates SSC CGL 2023 answer key

The Supreme Court on Thursday said it wished to personally meet the parents of a 31-year-old man who has remained in a comatose state for over 12 years, while hearing a plea filed by his father seeking permission for passive euthanasia through the withdrawal of artificial life support.

The man suffered severe head injuries after falling from the fourth floor of a building in 2013 and has since been dependent on an artificial life support system.

The Bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan examined a medical report submitted by a secondary medical board from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), detailing the patient’s condition and treatment history.

Describing the report as “sad”, the Bench observed, “We cannot keep this boy in this stage.”

Passive euthanasia involves allowing a patient to die by withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining medical treatment.

The Court scheduled a meeting with the patient’s parents at 3 pm on January 13, indicating its intent to hear them personally before taking a decision in the matter.

On the last hearing, the Court had directed AIIMS, New Delhi, to constitute a Secondary Medical Board to evaluate whether life-sustaining treatment may be withdrawn for Harish Rana. The Court had acted after a team of medical experts reported that his chances of recovery were “negligible”.

The Bench while hearing a Miscellaneous Application filed by Harish’s father under the Common Cause euthanasia framework, noted that the petitioner’s condition had deteriorated further since the Court last considered the matter.

Harish, who suffered severe injuries over a decade ago, is dependent on a tracheostomy tube for breathing and a gastrostomy tube for nutrition.

In compliance with the Court’s earlier direction, the Chief Medical Officer of Ghaziabad and four specialists; a neurologist, neurosurgeon, plastic surgeon and anaesthesiologist, conducted an in-home medical evaluation. Their report painted a grim picture.

Harish was found emaciated, with extensive contractures, bed sores, sluggish pupillary response, full dependence for all bodily functions and only basic brainstem activity. “The chances of his recovery from this state is negligible,” the doctors concluded.

Taking note of the findings, the Court held it necessary to move to the next step under the Common Cause guidelines (as modified in 2023), which require an independent assessment by a Secondary Medical Board before any decision on withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.

The Court also directed that the entire medical record, including photographs and the expert letter from LLRM Medical College, Meerut, be forwarded to the AIIMS Director immediately.

Case Title: Harish Rana v. Union of India & Ors.

Hearing Date: December 18, 2025

Bench: Justices JB Pardiwala and KV Viswanathan

Tags: