Supreme Court Dismisses Savukku Shankar’s Plea to Unseal Chennai Office, Asks Him to Approach Magistrate

Supreme Court refused to entertain the YouTuber Savukku Shankar’s writ plea and directed him to approach the jurisdictional magistrate under the BNSS

Update: 2026-01-20 10:47 GMT

Supreme Court declined to entertain YouTuber Savukku Shankar’s plea challenging the sealing of his Chennai office

The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to entertain a plea filed by YouTuber Savukku Shankar seeking directions to unseal his office in Chennai and for the return of devices seized in connection with allegations of assault and extortion levelled by a film producer.

The Bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Satish Chandra Sharma dismissed the petition, observing that the writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked for every grievance, and directed Shankar to pursue his remedies before the jurisdictional judicial magistrate.

“Don’t think the writ court is the panacea for all ills. Dismissed,” the Bench told Senior Advocate Balaji Srinivasan, who appeared on behalf of Shankar.

Shankar had approached the Supreme Court challenging an order of the Madras High Court dated December 30, 2025, by which the High Court declined to stay the sealing of his office premises and directed him to approach the magistrate under Sections 105 to 107 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.

In his plea before the Supreme Court, Shankar sought a direction to unseal his office located at Adambakkam in Chennai and to restrain the authorities from deploying police personnel at the entrance of the premises. He also sought the return of electronic devices seized during the course of the investigation.

The Madras High Court had earlier, on December 26, 2025, granted interim bail to Shankar on health grounds in as many as 17 criminal cases registered against him. While granting relief, the High Court had observed that the repeated curtailment of his personal liberty by the Tamil Nadu Police could only be construed as an “abuse of process of law.”

Shankar, a video journalist and the CEO of Savukku Media (OPC) Private Limited, has been lodged in Central Prison-II, Puzhal. His mother alleged that he had been continuously targeted by law enforcement agencies due to his investigative journalism and critical commentary on the functioning of the state government through his YouTube channel “Savukku Media”. Court noted that a preventive detention order passed against Shankar under the Goondas Act in May 2024 had earlier been set aside by the high court. It further recorded that a second detention order passed immediately after the first was quashed was later withdrawn by the state before the Supreme Court. The bench remarked that the repeated use of detention laws against the same individual raised serious questions about the misuse of statutory powers.

"This Court has time and again reiterated that due process of law shall not be misused to target specific individuals, who have fallen out of favour with the State Government. The professionalism and discipline of the uniformed personnel shall not be compromised under any circumstances by indulging in such forceful action unnecessarily. This series of allegations and the nature and mode of arrest as detailed in the affidavit raise suspicion as to the veracity of the allegations against the petitioner’s son,"
the Court had said.
Shankar was arrested on December 13 from his residence and booked under various provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution has alleged that he assaulted and extorted money from a film producer, accusations which Shankar has denied.

Case Title: Shankar@ Savukku Shankar v. The Inspector of Police 

Bench: Justices Dipankar Datta and Satish Chandra Sharma

Hearing Date: January 20, 2026

Tags:    

Similar News