Supreme Court Rejects Vidarbha Hockey Association's Plea, Cites One-State-One-Body Rule For Olympic Sports
Court allowed the association to withdraw its Special Leave Petition (SLP) after observing that no grounds for interference with the Bombay High Court’s order were made out;
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a plea by the Vidarbha Hockey Association seeking recognition as an associate member of Hockey India and the Indian Olympic Association, citing the regulatory principle that only one association from a state can represent an Olympic sport.
The Bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice Dipankar Datta allowed the association to withdraw its Special Leave Petition (SLP) after observing that no grounds for interference with the Bombay High Court’s order were made out.
The Bombay High Court, in its decision dated June 26, 2024, had upheld Hockey India’s decision to revoke the association’s membership, a move the Vidarbha Hockey Association challenged as arbitrary, claiming to have held associate member status until 2013.
During the hearing, the association’s counsel argued that other sports like cricket and kabaddi allow multiple associations. However, the bench clarified that unlike those sports, hockey is an Olympic discipline governed by the Indian Olympic Association’s rules, which permit only one recognized body per state.
The Bench further noted that even the Mumbai Hockey Association had been derecognized under the same rule. The Bench also questioned the association's decision to approach the Supreme Court directly via writ petition instead of the high court.
With the Court inclined to dismiss the petition, the association opted to withdraw it voluntarily.
Case Title: Vidarbha Hockey Association And Ors. v. Hockey India & Ors.