ARCHIVE SiteMap 2021-09-16
- [Right to Strike by Defence Personnel] Delhi High Court issues notice in plea challenging Essential Defence Services Act
- Inter-religious couple seeks Courts protection apprehending threat to life, Allahabad High Court says “even parents cannot object to two people in love”
- When insurer Company not able to prove contributory negligence of claimant, it is bound to pay insurance: Karnataka High Court [Read Judgment]
- "Amendments in written statement cannot completely displace former admissions made after commencement of trial": Kerala High Court [Read Judgment]
- [Breaking] Madras HC declines to Stay Rule 7 of the IT Rules 2021, stays Rule 9
- "Twitter not following Law of Land": Priyank Kanoongo tells Delhi High Court in POCSO case against Mohammed Zubair
- The Realities for Government of Delhi: Is the Lieutenant Governor the "Government"?
- “Rakesh Asthana having diverse experience, appointed Delhi Police Commissioner in public interest”, Centre tells Delhi High Court
- Accused’s failure to discharge burden under S.106 Evidence Act irrelevant if chain of circumstances not established, observes Supreme Court
- "Rehabilitation for Incarcerated women a tougher challenge as they face graver stigma, prejudices": CJI NV Ramana
- Delhi High Court seeks IRCTC reply in plea for parity in fee relaxations to catering units of all 4 Zones
- Kashmiri Pandits a "separately identifiable community": Jammu & Kashmir HC denies Kashmiri Non-Migrant Hindus benefits of PM Package jobs' quota for Kashmiri Pandits