MP Sujeet Kumar’s Legislative Push Signals a New Direction in India’s Legal Landscape

Rajya Sabha MP Sujeet Kumar has, in recent years, emerged as one of the more distinct voices in Parliament’s legal landscape. At a time when India’s legislative space is being reshaped by new technology, environmental stress and demands for institutional transparency, he is among the lawmakers attempting to build legal structures suited to a rapidly changing society.

His interventions indicate a move toward a more research driven, future oriented style of lawmaking that is still relatively rare in the country’s legislative culture.

His legislative work has been most striking in domains where the law is still unsettled.

The Machine Created Intellectual Asset Bill, 2025 is one of the earliest efforts in India to respond to the legal uncertainty surrounding artificial intelligence.

As AI begins to generate original content, influence decision making and participate in creative and commercial processes, traditional notions of authorship and liability have become insufficient.

The bill attempts to fill that vacuum by defining how AI-generated works should be treated in law, proposing rules on ownership, attribution and fair use. It actually represents an attempt to anticipate problems before they reach crisis proportion, placing him among the first parliamentarians to meaningfully intervene in India’s emerging AI jurisprudence.

Further, Classified Information and Espionage Control Bill, 2025 is another example of this forward-looking approach. The proposal seeks to overhaul how sensitive information is classified, accessed and protected.

By outlining clearer categories of information and defining proportionate penalties, the bill attempts to bring the law closer to contemporary standards of national security and public accountability.

It reflects an understanding that secrecy must be regulated through a precise and transparent statutory mechanism rather than broad prohibitions inherited from a colonial legislative structure.

The Ecocide (Prevention and Accountability) Bill, 2025 further underscores the legislator's interest in expanding India’s legal imagination. At a time when environmental degradation is no longer episodic but systemic, the bill proposes a legal definition of ecocide and identifies the actors who may be held responsible for large-scale environmental harm.

It also lays down mechanisms for restoration and remedies, signalling a shift from viewing environmental violations merely as regulatory breaches to treating them as serious offences with long-term social and ecological consequences.

In aligning India with an emerging global movement towards recognising ecocide as a legal wrong, the bill pushes Parliament to consider environmental harm as a matter of justice and accountability rather than only compliance and compensation.

Across these initiatives, a consistent pattern emerges. MP Sujeet Kumar gravitates towards areas where traditional legal frameworks are inadequate or silent. His bills are structured, heavily researched and grounded in comparative legal study, suggesting a deliberate attempt to create clarity in spaces characterised by ambiguity.

His role in the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs has further deepened his engagement with foundational legal reform.

The committee’s work on India’s transition from the colonial era IPC, CrPC and Evidence Act to the new criminal law structure required a detailed examination of how policing, investigation and trial processes should function in a modern democracy.

In those deliberations, MP Sujeet Kumar consistently emphasised the need for coherence across statutes, clarity in procedural safeguards and fairness in the criminal justice process.

His involvement placed him at the centre of one of the most significant legal overhauls in recent decades.

Also Read: Rajya Sabha MP Sujeet Kumar Calls for Removing ‘Lord’ Prefix from Names of Former British Officials