Senior Advocate Satish Parasaran writes

  • Thyagarajan Narendran
  • 08:21 PM, 10 Oct 2021

Read Time: 16 minutes

Thyagarajan’s note:

I started my practice at Coimbatore, a relatively small bar when compared to Madras and Delhi. I had only heard of seniors like Mr.Satish Parasaran, I was absolutely star struck at Chennai when I saw seniors argue a case in the court. I was more surprised when I realised these seniors were accessible to juniors, I have seen many seniors come to the aid of juniors when they found them struggling with a point of law in court even when they are not briefed in a matter. Despite having spent just a year in Madras High Court, I have the fondest memories from there.

I hadn’t interacted with Mr.Satish Parasaran when I was in Chennai, but there was a buzz wherever he went to appear. On one occasion when I was in what was then the Company Law Board (CLB), a friend was carrying 2 empty note books when I asked him why he said, “Mr.Satish Parasaran is arguing, you are not supposed to miss noting even his banter with the bench.”

When I decided to compile such anecdotes, his junior suggested that I get in touch with him. When I sent him a message last year, he replied back immediately saying this was a good initiative and he will send a few anecdotes from his early career. I was surprised to find that he had typed it all out himself and sent them to me.  I don’t intend to write over it and spoil the flow. I am publishing them as it is.

Mr. Satish Parasaran writes...



Even before I entered the profession, one small blunder had threatened to put me off course in LL.B. that I was pursuing in the Campus Law Centre, Delhi. To appear in the exam required all the students to fill and submit a form in the college. I had duly filled the form and submitted the same in good time. We were to collect the hall ticket a few days before the exam. When I approached the college authorities for my hall ticket, I was told that my form was still lying in the office due to non-payment of the examination fee. My offer of payment was refused on the ground that the last date for the payment had long expired. All my appeals up to the Vice Chancellor (no less than Mr. Upendra Baxi) failed. The only small keyhole of a hope was to knock at the doors of the Examination Controller. Having failed in my personal attempts, I felt the necessity of approaching through someone who commanded respect. My father (Mr. K. Parasaran, who was the Attorney General of India from 1983-89) had demitted office as the Attorney General a few years ago. Still, I asked him if he could put in a word. I knew that the chance of him seeking a favour, that too for his own son, was slim. But, I still asked. And he refused!

Dad’s secretary Raman called me aside and said - “Why did you even ask your father when G. Ramaswamy (Attorney General of India from 1990-92) is there as the Attorney General?!”

The next day was the first exam on Constitutional Law. I hesitantly called Sri. G. Ramaswamy. He immediately called me over to his office. In a matter of half hour, he has spoken to the Examination Controller and the issue was resolved over a phone call.


A year later (September 1992), I enrolled as an advocate at the TN Bar Council. It has been a practice in our office that a fresher should make an appearance in Court in the very first week of his/her enrolment. A few days after my enrolment, I was asked to appear in a writ petition before Justice K.S Bhakthavatsalam. I did not then realise that I couldn’t have asked for a more affable judge to appear before. When the matter was called, I muttered a few words hardly audible to myself even while sweating profusely. Realising that I was a chicken just out of the egg shell, the judge had a quick glance at the affidavit and found the case deserving of an admission and an interim order.


In the very second week after my enrolment, a contempt petition filed by the race day employees against the Madras Race Club was listed before a division bench comprising of Justice Venkatasamy and Justice Abdul Hadi. The bench assembled at 11 am and the matter was called. Neither of the two seniors, Mohan and Seshadri, were in sight. I got up and requested for a two week adjournment blissfully unaware of the seriousness of the case or the fact that it was being taken up by a special bench. My request with an air of confidence even provoked an extremely soft judge as Justice Venkatasamy who gave me a verbal lashing for close to 5 mins (though it then looked like an hour for me!) with Justice Hadi joining in whenever he could. That was the last that I entered a court without having read the entire case even if I was only to keep a watch until one of the seniors arrived.


The lack of experience also brings with it courage and confidence that over the years get tempered with a sense of caution. Barely two years into the profession, a client from Mahe approached our office aggrieved by the rejection of his kerosene dealership Application by the Oil Selection Board, headed by a retired High Court Judge. He showed me the rejection letter and other related papers. The Sherlock Holmes in me found something amiss in the rejection letter. The letter mentioned the place where his interview had earlier taken place. This seemed totally out of place in a rejection letter. Immediately I took the interview intimation letter and placed both one over the other and put them under the light. The typed portion matched perfectly proving that both the interview letter and the rejection letter were typed together with a carbon paper in between, thereby implying that the poor chap’s fate was sealed even on the date he was called for interview. I readied the writ petition and moved it before a judge before who interim order was very difficult to come by. I demonstrated to him that the rejection letter was readied along with the interview letter. The judge was taken aback and immediately granted the interim stay. I basked in the glory of the stay order for a few weeks. Then came the counter affidavit from the Oil Selection Board signed by the retired judge himself. At the very outset, he admitted that the rejection letter was typed simultaneously with the interview letter with a carbon in between. His explanation was simple and formidable. He said that he was given just two clerks to assist him in the selection process. With hundreds of applicants, it was impossible to type the interview letter once and then the rejection letters again. So, even at the time of typing the interview letter, the rejection letters were also readied. After the interview, the regret letters of the successful applicants were destroyed and the rest were posted. A case that appeared open and shut in my client’s favour until then stood demolished with this simple explanation. The writ petition was dismissed by Justice Shivaraj Patil and a half hearted appeal was dispatched by a bench presided over by Justice AR. Lakshmanan.