<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://lawbeat.in/news-updates/compromise-alone-cannot-quash-fir-over-firing-incident-mp-high-court-1650313</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[LawBeat]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-11-09T16:50:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Compromise Alone Cannot Quash FIR Over Firing Incident: MP High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[MP High Court quashing FIR compromise, Gwalior High Court firing case, Section 528 BNSS quashing, compromise cannot quash serious offence, attempt to murder compromise High Court, Laxmi Narayan Supreme Court quashing, Vijay Kumar Kela v CBI 2026 INSC 588, Sirol police station FIR quashment, Justice Rajesh Kumar Gupta order, quashing FIR on settlement India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://lawbeat.in/h-upload/2026/11/09/2310216-mp-high-court-settlememntjpg.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://lawbeat.in/news-updates/comparison-directed-at-officials-not-religion-delhi-court-refuses-fir-against-cm-rekha-gupta-over-hanuman-remark-1650308</loc>
<lastmod>2026-11-09T17:12:21+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[LawBeat]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-11-09T16:41:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA["Comparison Directed At Officials, Not Religion": Delhi Court Refuses FIR Against CM Rekha Gupta Over Hanuman Remark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rekha Gupta, Delhi Chief Minister, Hanuman remark, Rekha Gupta Hanuman, Section 299 BNS, outraging religious feelings, Section 175(3) BNSS, Section 156(3) CrPC, FIR application dismissed, Rouse Avenue Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://lawbeat.in/h-upload/2026/11/09/2310224-delhi-rouse-avenue-court-rekha-guptajpg.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://lawbeat.in/top-stories/supreme-court-orders-sit-into-illegal-bajri-mining-in-jojari-luni-rivers-1650227</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[LawBeat]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-11-09T13:50:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Orders SIT Into Illegal Bajri Mining In Jojari-Luni Rivers]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Jojari river pollution, Luni river Supreme Court, Jojari-Bandi-Luni river ecosystem, Supreme Court SIT illegal bajri mining, illegal sand mining Rajasthan, post facto regularisation of illegal mining, High Flood Line buffer zone, 100 metre protective zone river, Supreme Court news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://lawbeat.in/h-upload/2026/11/09/2309850-supreme-court-of-india-rajasthan-river-pollution-2026jpg.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://lawbeat.in/news-updates/mp-high-court-says-party-should-not-pay-for-counsels-mistake-asks-bar-council-to-examine-advocates-conduct-1650193</loc>
<lastmod>2026-11-09T15:31:58+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[LawBeat]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-11-09T13:14:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[MP High Court Says Party Should Not Pay For Counsel’s Mistake, Asks Bar Council To Examine Advocates’ Conduct]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[MP High Court ex parte order, litigant should not suffer for lawyer’s mistake, advocate negligence ex parte proceedings, Article 227 miscarriage of justice, State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh, Section 35 Advocates Act professional misconduct, WhatsApp chat evidence Section 65B, Indore High Court judgment,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://lawbeat.in/h-upload/2026/11/09/2309863-mp-high-court-advocatejpg.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://lawbeat.in/supreme-court-judgments/supreme-court-says-its-requests-to-courts-tribunals-must-be-treated-as-directions-pulls-up-nclat-1649998</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[LawBeat]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-11-07T17:34:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Says Its 'Requests' To Courts, Tribunals Must Be Treated As Directions; Pulls Up NCLAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court news, NCLAT, Supreme Court direction are binding, supreme court requests or directs, NCLAT non-compliance supreme court judgment, Section 7 IBC, insolvency, NCLT, tribunals]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://lawbeat.in/h-upload/2026/11/06/2308787-supreme-court-nclat-request-direction-section-7-ibcjpg.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
