<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://lawbeat.in/top-stories/supreme-court-orders-sit-into-illegal-bajri-mining-in-jojari-luni-rivers-1650227</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[LawBeat]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-11-09T13:50:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Orders SIT Into Illegal Bajri Mining In Jojari-Luni Rivers]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Jojari river pollution, Luni river Supreme Court, Jojari-Bandi-Luni river ecosystem, Supreme Court SIT illegal bajri mining, illegal sand mining Rajasthan, post facto regularisation of illegal mining, High Flood Line buffer zone, 100 metre protective zone river, Supreme Court news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://lawbeat.in/h-upload/2026/11/09/2309850-supreme-court-of-india-rajasthan-river-pollution-2026jpg.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://lawbeat.in/news-updates/mp-high-court-says-party-should-not-pay-for-counsels-mistake-asks-bar-council-to-examine-advocates-conduct-1650193</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[LawBeat]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-11-09T13:14:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[MP High Court Says Party Should Not Pay For Counsel’s Mistake, Asks Bar Council To Examine Advocates’ Conduct]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[MP High Court ex parte order, litigant should not suffer for lawyer’s mistake, advocate negligence ex parte proceedings, Article 227 miscarriage of justice, State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh, Section 35 Advocates Act professional misconduct, WhatsApp chat evidence Section 65B, Indore High Court judgment,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://lawbeat.in/h-upload/2026/11/09/2309863-mp-high-court-advocatejpg.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://lawbeat.in/supreme-court-judgments/supreme-court-says-its-requests-to-courts-tribunals-must-be-treated-as-directions-pulls-up-nclat-1649998</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[LawBeat]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-11-07T17:34:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Says Its 'Requests' To Courts, Tribunals Must Be Treated As Directions; Pulls Up NCLAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court news, NCLAT, Supreme Court direction are binding, supreme court requests or directs, NCLAT non-compliance supreme court judgment, Section 7 IBC, insolvency, NCLT, tribunals]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://lawbeat.in/h-upload/2026/11/06/2308787-supreme-court-nclat-request-direction-section-7-ibcjpg.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
