2020 Delhi Riots: Court Seeks Tahir Hussain's Financial Affidavit Before Sentencing In Ankit Sharma Murder Case
Karkardooma Court directed Tahir Hussain and other convicts to file socio-economic status affidavits before hearing arguments on sentencing in the Ankit Sharma murder case
A Delhi court on Thursday directed former Aam Aadmi Party councillor Tahir Hussain and four other convicts in the murder case of Intelligence Bureau (IB) staffer Ankit Sharma to file affidavits disclosing their socio-economic status before the sentencing hearing.
Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Praveen Singh of the Karkardooma Court issued the direction to the convicts' counsel, including advocate Rajiv Mohan appearing for Hussain, and asked them to consult their clients and place the affidavits on record the same day.
The court also deferred arguments on the quantum of sentence to July 27 after Hussain's counsel sought time for the sentencing hearing.
On July 13, the court convicted Tahir Hussain and four others for the murder of IB official Ankit Sharma during the 2020 North East Delhi riots.
The court held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt against Hussain for offences punishable under Sections 188, 153A read with 149, 147 read with 149, 148 read with 149, 365 read with 149, and 302 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
Hussain was, however, acquitted of charges under Sections 120B, 505, 109 and 114 IPC.
The remaining convicts, Nazim, Kasim and Anas, were also convicted for offences including murder, kidnapping, rioting, promoting enmity and unlawful assembly. They too were acquitted of the criminal conspiracy charge under Section 120B IPC, while Nazim was additionally acquitted of offences under the Arms Act.
According to the judgment, forensic investigators who inspected Hussain's building in Khajuri Khas on February 28, 2020, recovered stones, bricks, a catapult, petrol bombs, glass bottles stuffed with cloth, bullets and burnt articles from the terrace and surrounding area. The court observed that the building was allegedly used by rioters for stone-pelting and hurling petrol and acid bombs during the communal violence.
The judgment further recorded that eyewitnesses identified Hussain and several co-accused as participants in the violence. Witness Vikalp Kochar specifically identified Tahir Hussain and co-accused Anas as being involved in the murder of Ankit Sharma, while other witnesses identified several accused persons allegedly involved in rioting and arson at Hussain's instigation.
Background of the Case
The case pertains to a FIR registered at Dayalpur Police Station on the basis of the complaint made by Ankit Sharma’s father, Ravinder Kumar. He alleged that on February 25, 2020, his son, who was posted in the Intelligence Bureau (IB), had come back from the office and gone out, and did not return after a long time.
The complainant father came to know from local boys that his son Ankit Sharma had been “thrown” into Khajuri Khas “nala” (drain) from the masjid in Chand Bagh pulia after “he was killed.” His body was recovered from the nala. The deceased’s father, in his complaint, had raised strong suspicion that his son Ankit Sharma had been killed by Tahir Hussain and others, who had gathered in his office, and that after killing his son, his body was thrown into the nala from the masjid.
On March 24, 2023, the trial court framed charges against Hussain and ten co-accused, namely Haseen alias Mullaji alias Salman, Nazim, Kasim, Sameer Khan, Anas, Firoz, Javed, Gulfam, Shoaib Alam alias Bobby, and Muntajim alias Musa.
ASJ Pulastya Pramachala framed charges against Hussain and ten others, namely, Haseen @ Mullaji @ Salman, Nazim, Kasim, Sameer Khan, Anas, Firoz, Javed, Gulfam, Shoaib Alam @ Bobby, and Muntajim @ Musa. All the accused persons have been charged under Sections 147 (rioting), 148 (rioting, armed with a deadly weapon), 153A (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence), and 302 (murder) read with 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
Hussain has also been charged under Sections 109 (abetment), 114 (abettor present when offence is committed), and 505 (statements conducing to public mischief) of the IPC. In its order, Additional Sessions Judge Pulastya Pramachala observed, “He (Hussain) instigated the mob when Ankit came forward towards this mob. The conspiracy need not be specific to kill Ankit. When the accused persons were acting in pursuance to a conspiracy and common object to kill Hindus, it covered killing of Ankit as well for the reasons that Ankit was killed because he was a Hindu.”
Violence broke out in Northeast Delhi in 2020 during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act, which followed widespread clashes between the supporters and opponents of the Act. Several incidents of stone-pelting, arson, and violent protests were reported, which had left nearly 53 dead and injured thousands.
Bench: Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Praveen Singh
Hearing Date: July 23, 2026