Read Time: 10 minutes
During the course of the hearing, the division bench also remarked that the guidelines and action plans were only on paper but there was no progress on the ground
The Bombay High Court on Monday issued various directions to the civic authorities and the State Government to take measures in view of the rising pollution and AQI in the City of Mumbai.
The division bench of the high court comprising Chief Justice Devendra K Upadhyaya and Justice Girish Kulkarni was hearing the suo moto Public Interest Litigation in light of the poor air condition in Mumbai.
The division bench issued the following direction to be followed by the authorities to ensure that the air quality index does not deteriorate.
During the course of the hearing, the division bench also remarked that the guidelines and action plans were only on paper but there was no progress on the ground.
“Let us agree that this is not adversarial Litigation. The State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) has to be vigilant. This is not confined to Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation(BMC) alone…all municipal corporations. Everybody has to come together. Theoretically on paper looks like everything is in place but on ground, nothing is done,” the bench said.
The bench also formed a two-member committee of members from the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) and directed the Director General of Medical and Public Health, Municipal Commissioners to submit a report to the committee on a daily basis.
During the hearing, the bench also remarked that we need to make a choice if the citizens want to live in a disease-free environment or burst firecrackers
“We have to make a choice. Either we have a disease-free environment or we burst fire crackers and celebrate the festival. The state government will have to take a call. We cannot even walk on the footpath,” the bench said.
The bench also said that we ourselves (citizens) have created this situation (bad air quality).
“We are living on earth.. dependence on nature is understandable but we have created this situation..” CJ Upadhyaya said.
Advocate General Birendra Saraf informed the bench that the major sources of pollution were infrastructure development in the city.
"Major is the construction of the private company and infrastructure development in the city which are public projects. There are construction sites. These are the main sources of dust and with weather conditions and wind speed, the dust is not going to other sources. The other source is open debris and transportation of debris. We have issued a closure notice due to factory emissions. There is a crackdown now. 31A notices are given," AG said.
Senior Advocate Milind Sathe appearing for the BMC informed the bench that construction sites are being visited on daily basis and even the roads are being cleaned by the BMC.
"We have issued guidelines in March 2023. It's not like we have woken up now. The last guideline was 2 days before your lordship took suo moto. 1118 sites are visited and 812 sites have been served with notice. 250 km of roads are being washed on a daily basis which is dust prone zone," Sathe said
The bench will now hear the suo moto PIL on Friday.
Case title: High Court on its own motion
Please Login or Register