Ajeet Bharti’s Anticipatory Bail Plea In SC/ST Act Case Adjourned To September 7 By Delhi Court
Ajeet Bharti’s anticipatory bail plea in an SC/ST Act case over allegedly objectionable YouTube remarks was adjourned by a Delhi court to September 7
A Delhi court on Monday adjourned YouTuber Ajeet Bharti’s anticipatory bail plea in a case registered against him under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act over allegedly objectionable remarks made during a YouTube broadcast.
After brief hearing in the case, the Court had directed that, if the Investigating Officer issues such a notice, a copy must also be placed before it. The Court said this would enable the Court to examine the date of issuance of the notice and the prima facie satisfaction regarding the ingredients of an offence under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The Investigating Officer has been summoned and notice has been issued to the police on the anticipatory bail plea.
FIR over YouTube broadcast
The FIR was registered at North Avenue Police Station, Delhi, following a complaint by Balakram Bauddh, Delhi State President of the Azad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram), the party headed by Nagina MP Chandrashekhar Azad.
The complaint relates to remarks allegedly made by Bharti during an August 22 YouTube programme titled “SB79: Reservation Hatao Andolan Nautanki & More | Saptahik Bakaiti.”
The complainant has alleged that Bharti made caste-based and abusive remarks concerning Chandrashekhar Azad and Dr BR Ambedkar, besides making sexually objectionable comments concerning women and issuing threats.
According to the complaint, the videos contain a continuous sequence of statements concerning caste, reservation, marriage, and members of Scheduled Caste communities. It alleges that the accused repeatedly invoked caste identity in a derogatory and humiliating context.
Apart from the provisions of the SC/ST Act, the FIR invokes Section 67 of the Information Technology Act and Sections 196(1)(c) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) (Section 153-A and 506 of IPC).
Bharti's defence
Bharti has publicly denied making casteist remarks. He has maintained that the statements were made in response to what he described as an offensive comment concerning his mother and sister.
In his plea, he has taken the position before the Court that the allegations do not satisfy the ingredients of an offence under the SC/ST Act.
It is his further case that no caste-based remark was made against Chandrashekhar, nor was he insulted using any casteist slur in this regard. Therefore, no case is made out.
Ajeet Bharti has claimed that the case was filed after pressure was exerted on police by Azad Samaj Party members. "I know how much pressure the Azad Samaj Party members exerted at Delhi Police’s North Avenue Police Station to get this FIR registered at midnight. It will not stand for two minutes in court. Not a single section will hold" Bharti wrote on X.
He added: "Today, whether a person understands their fundamental rights or not, they certainly knows what the SC/ST Act is. Therefore, when I speak, I am aware of my limits, however unfair they may be, regarding what I can and cannot say”.
Case Title: State of Delhi v. Ajeet Bharti
Bench: ASJ Saurabh Pratap Singh Laler
Hearing Date: August 31, 2026