Read Time: 04 minutes

Synopsis

The Delhi High Court, recently, rebuked the AAP-led State Government, expressing concern that its main focus appeared to be gaining power rather than ensuring the welfare of students. 

A Division Bench headed by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and comprising Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora observed that despite being apprehended, Arvind Kejriwal's refusal to step down was interpreted as prioritizing personal interests over national interests.

The court cautioned the government against underestimating its authority, asserting that the well-being of children should not be manipulated as a bargaining tool. The government acknowledged the dire circumstances in Delhi, where numerous vital services were stalled due to the MCD's impasse.

During the proceedings, the Standing Counsel Shadan Farasat, representing the State, conveyed instructions from Urban Development Minister Saurabh Bhardwaj, indicating that without the Standing Committee of MCD, further delegation of powers would require the Chief Minister's consent, who was presently in judicial custody.

Standing Counsel Farasat argued that the absence of a standing committee in the MCD stemmed from the unlawful appointment of aldermen by the Lieutenant Governor, a matter currently under review by the Supreme Court. He further contended that the Delhi government's authority was limited.

In response, the court criticized the Delhi government for its apparent disregard for students' education, accusing it of prioritizing power over their well-being. The court reiterated that the absence of a committee did not justify allowing students to study without textbooks. It expressed dissatisfaction with the government's decision to continue functioning despite the Chief Minister's detention, cautioning of potential repercussions.

The court also criticized the actions of Bhardwaj, highlighting his apparent neglect of students' plight and accusing him of turning a blind eye.

Accordingly, the court reserved the judgment for April 29, 2024.