Bombay High Court Reserves Order In Plea Challenging Hijab Ban In Mumbai College

Read Time: 05 minutes

Synopsis

The counsel appearing for the college management submitted that the uniform was applicable to each and every community and not just Muslims

The Bombay High Court on Wednesday said that it will pass an order on interim relief in a petition challenging the ban on hijab, niqab, burqa, stole, etc., in NG Acharya and DK Marathe College of Mumbai on June 26, 2024.

The division bench of the high court, comprising Justice AS Chandurkar and Justice Rajesh Patil, was hearing a petition filed by nine girl students of the college challenging the ban imposed by the college management.

The counsel appearing for the college management submitted that the uniform was applicable to each and every community and not just Muslims. He added that even if someone were to wear a bhagwa in the college, it would not be allowed.

He argued that allowing such exceptions could lead to disharmony. Furthermore, he added that under the right to choice, anyone could advocate for anything they want, which could disrupt the uniformity and discipline of the college.

Furthermore, he submitted that the only restriction imposed was for students to wear Indian or Western dresses.

He maintained that the sole intent behind issuing such instructions was to ensure that people do not wear revealing clothes or clothes that disclose their religious identity.

"Imagine someone says tomorrow that i am advocating nudism. He will say I have the right to come nude in court. Priority is study. Do I say people belonging to a religion should sit on back benches? I am implementing it for everybody. What's the objection? Sending the petition to the press shows their intention. Lordship may also dismiss on the ground there is no bona fide," he argued. 

The counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the students had been wearing hijabs, niqabs, and burqas for two years, and there had been no disharmony to date. He questioned the management's apprehension about the sudden disharmony that would be caused.

He further argued that Indian dress included the attire worn by Indian Muslims.

"The college says indian/western non revealing dress. The constitution came in 1950. Every citizen irrespective of religion or dress is Indian. I am an Indian Muslim. They can't argue that the hijab is not an Indian dress. Every dress including sari and salwar is an Indian dress," he said.

Furthermore, he also relied on the National Education Policy, which talks about diversity and inclusivity in schools and colleges. He also cited UGC guidelines that emphasize equity.

After hearing both parties, the court said it will pass orders on interim relief on 26th June.