[Tajinder Bagga Defamation Case] Satisfy us on maintainability: Delhi High Court seeks Subramanian Swamy's explanation in plea against summons

Read Time: 05 minutes

Synopsis

Bagga has alleged that Swamy, who has over 10 million followers on Twitter, put out a “false and incorrect” tweet accusing him of being jailed after joining the BJP

The Delhi High Court on Thursday asked Rajya Sabha MP Subramanian Swamy "to satisfy it on the maintainability" of his plea challenging summons issued by a trial court in a defamation complaint filed by BJP leader Tajinder Pal Singh Bagga over a tweet claiming it to be false and defamatory.

The bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma said the petitioner instead of invoking the revisional jurisdiction of the Additional Sessions Judge has filed the present petition under Article 226/227 read with Section 482 of the CrPC for setting aside/quashing of the criminal complaint.

“It is a settled law that the summoning order passed by the court of MM/ACMM is amenable to revisional jurisdiction”, the judge said.

During the hearing today, the counsel appearing for Swamy submitted, “This is an early hearing application. This matter is coming for the final disposal the 7th time. The respondents have not entered their appearance since April last year, but they have continued to appear before the trial court on every date. They have been served thrice last year and earlier this year as well. My humblest submission before this court is that in light of the respondents conduct. This petition be disposed of”.

“The conduct of the respondents amount to them taking this court for a…such a conduct might not be permitted in any manner”, the counsel contended.

The court ordered, “Let the arguments be addressed on the maintainability of the petition, in the meantime let the respondents be served through the concerned SHO. Interim orders to continue”. Accordingly, the court posted the matter for hearing on August 23, the date already fixed.

Notably, on April 4, 2022, the court had stayed the summons issued by the trial court.

Bagga has alleged that Swamy, who has over 10 million followers on Twitter, put out a “false and incorrect” tweet accusing him of being jailed after joining the BJP.

The tweet made by Swamy reads as:

“Delhi journalists inform me that before joining BJP, Tajinder Bagga had been jailed many times for petty crime sin New Delhi Mandir Marg police station. True? If so Nadda should know”

The Magistrate court had summoned Swamy vide order dated March 2, 2022 for offences punishable under Section 500 IPC. Bagga had filed a complaint under Section 190 CrPC read with Section 200 IPC on a tweet made by Swamy.

Case Title: Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. Tajinder Pal Singh Bagga