Read Time: 06 minutes
The court was hearing an appeal filed by Khalid Saifi in the 2020 Delhi Riots case, challenging the Trial Court's decision to deny him bail
The Delhi High Court expressed concern on Tuesday regarding the protracted arguments presented by the prosecution in the bail plea hearing of Khalid Saifi, an accused in a case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) linked to the 2020 Delhi riots.
A division bench of Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Manoj Jain expressed its dissatisfaction with the seemingly endless arguments put forth by the prosecution.
Emphasizing that the court is tasked with adjudicating bail pleas and not appeals against convictions or acquittals, the bench underscored the necessity for succinct arguments.
During the hearing, Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad referred to WhatsApp chats and other details from the chargesheet to underscore the alleged involvement of various accused individuals in the purported riot conspiracy.
However, the bench indicated its reluctance to entertain prolonged discussions.
As the prosecution delved into the content of WhatsApp chats purportedly linked to the riots, the court urged the prosecution to present clear evidence establishing a direct link to violence.
In an oral observation, the bench remarked, "One can understand you need one hour, a quarter of an hour. But we cannot grant unlimited time. Show us what the conspiracy is and what the person’s role is. Summarize your arguments. We are not hearing appeals but only bail… We are not going to read 7,000 pages."
Furthermore, the bench emphasized the need for the prosecution to present compelling evidence against Saifi, stating, "We are not looking for a story. Show us the material, point out his role, and we will consider... If there is no case with you, we can say no case. We can grant bail. Give us material against him."
Highlighting the importance of expeditious resolution, the bench reiterated that the court cannot prolong the hearing indefinitely, stating, "We need to see the matter on merit... We cannot hear it for days."
The matter is scheduled for further hearing on February 13.
Trial Court Order
Earlier, the Trial Court's Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat dismissed Saifi's bail plea, stating that the allegations against him seemed prima facie true.
Senior Advocate Rebecca John had argued that Khalid Saifi was falsely implicated and that the entire case of the prosecution remained unsubstantiated and devoid of evidence. She had submitted that the prosecution relied on a WhatsApp Group called "DPSG." However, Khalid Saifi's participation in the said group was only peripheral and could not be used as evidence of any criminal conspiracy.
SPP Amit Prasad had submitted that Khalid Saifi was a member of the WhatsApp group DPSG, CAB Team, and United Against Hate (UAH) Okhla. He had also alleged that Khalid attended a meeting in Jangpura, Delhi, which was also attended by Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Meeran Haider, and others.
Allegedly, Khalid Saifi also attended the meeting on December 26, 2019, at Lodhi Colony, after which DPSG was created on December 28, 2019.
Case Title: Abdul Khalid Saifi @ Khalid v. State
Please Login or Register
