Read Time: 03 minutes

Synopsis

The Rouse Avenue Court today denied interim bail to BRS leader K. Kavitha in connection with the Delhi excise policy case. Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for K Kavitha, relied on Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). Singhvi emphasized the emotional support required by Kavitha's son during his examinations, underlining the significance of maternal presence.

However, Special Judge Kaveri Baweja, while denying interim bail, cited that he has familial support and is not alone in managing his academic commitments.

K. Kavitha was apprehended by the ED on March 15 and has been in judicial custody at Tihar Jail. 

The Enforcement Directorate (ED), represented by Advocate Zoheb Hossain argued that Kavitha had allegedly destroyed material evidence pertinent to the case. This destruction occurred when she formatted her phone prior to joining the investigation, thus obstructing the collection of crucial evidence,ED claimed.

Furthermore, ED accused Kavitha of exerting influence over potential witnesses involved in the case. The ED expressed concerns that if granted bail, there is a high probability of her continuing to tamper with witnesses, thereby compromising the integrity of the judicial process.

Additionally, contrary to any claims of vulnerability, the ED asserted that Kavitha, being a “well-placed” and “well-educated” member of society, did not fit the criteria of a vulnerable individual deserving of special consideration.

The ED underscored that gender should not serve as a basis for special treatment, asserting that Kavitha's status as a woman did not entitle her to discretionary favor in the legal proceedings.

The court denied the interim bail application and listed her plea for regular bail for April 16, 2024. 

Case Title: Kalvakuntla Kavitha v Directorate Of Enforcement (Bail Matters 48 of 2024)