Read Time: 09 minutes
The petitioner claimed that the illegal withholding of the petitioner’s application caused her “grave prejudice”, and that she had not been able to travel back to India to see her family since the onset of the pandemic, for the last three years
The Delhi High Court on Monday directed the respondent authorities to "expedite the process of police verification" in a transgender woman’s plea seeking direction to the authorities to re-issue her passport with her revised particulars, including her new name and gender, since her appearance changed after undergoing sex reassignment surgery.
During the hearing, the counsel for the Centre informed that the police verification is pending in the present case.
Justice Subramonium Prasad ordered, “The respondents are requested to expedite the process to ensure the petitioner is in a position to travel”.
“I don’t intent to let go of this matter…I want the further instructions you have. I don’t want to let go of this matter till some streamlining is made for many others who probably can’t approach the courts if they need”, Justice Prasad remarked orally.
The matter will be taken up for further consideration on September 18, 2023.
Earlier, the judge had remarked, "Transgender people, who choose to undergo sex reassignment surgery, face difficulties in acquiring a fresh passport due to change in appearance, an issue which needs to be streamlined”.
“Similar problems are arising in several matters and these people are suffering because of lack of passport after they changed their gender. Because then their appearance changes. It needs some streamlining,” the judge had said while asking the authorities to look into it.
The petitioner Anahita Chaudhary in her plea sought directions to the authorities to re-issue her passport with revised particulars changing her name, gender, and appearance as per her application of January 18, 2023. The plea stated that the application had been pending with the respondent authorities for over six months.
Chaudhary in her plea also stated that grave prejudice was caused to the petitioner in view of non-issuance of the revised passport by the authorities. “This is so as the petitioner, who is at present in Chicago, United States of America, is unduly prevented from travelling back to India, her come country”, she said in her plea.
“As a matter of fact, the inaction on the part of the Petitioners has prevented the Petitioner from travelling anywhere outside the USA”, the plea said.
The petitioner is a transgender woman who was assigned a male name and gender at birth. In 2018, the petitioner moved to the United States of America on an H1-B visa after securing gainful employment in that country. The petitioner transitioned between 2016 and 2022 and underwent sex reassignment surgery in 2022.
“Once the petitioner transitioned, she was able to legally secure a change of name and gender by way of a court order in the United States. Consequently, she was able to legally rectify her name/gender/appearance as it appeared on official documentation, for instance, her Illinois driver’s license”, the plea stated.
The plea said that in the present case, the petitioner had also submitted the requisite medical certificate to demonstrate that she had undergone sex reassignment surgery (male to female SRS) along with her application. She further stated that despite various requests for updates, the respondents were yet to take a decision on the petitioner for over seven months.
On March 7, 2023, the petitioner was informed that since her case is a “gender change case” the same was pending with the 1st respondent ministry. “Subsequent representations/reminders to the Respondents have gone unanswered”, the plea stated.
Chaudhary claimed that the illegal withholding of the petitioner’s application caused her “grave prejudice”, and that she had not been able to travel back to India to see her family since the onset of the pandemic, for the last three years. The undue delay in processing the petitioner’s application resulted in a “deprivation of her right to travel abroad” including her “right to travel back to her home country”, which is a facet of her “personal liberty”.
“The petitioner’s right to get a re-issuance of her passport with revised particulars is a facet of her right to self-identification protected by Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner’s right to self-identify is curtailed as her name, gender and appearance does not match with what is currently on her passport”, the plea read.
Case Title: Anahita Chaudhary v. Union of India & Anr.
Please Login or Register
