Read Time: 06 minutes
Chakraborty was apprehended on October 03, 2023, after an FIR was lodged, accusing both Indian and foreign entities of unlawfully injecting foreign finances into India, with intentions deemed hostile to the sovereignty and unity of the nation
The Delhi High Court, on Monday, granted bail to Amit Chakraborty, the Human Resources head, who has agreed to cooperate as an approver in the NewsClick UAPA case.
Chakraborty willingly assisted the investigation by providing truthful information and sought forgiveness according to Section 306(4)(b) of CrPC. This section stipulates that once forgiveness is accepted, the individual cannot be released until the trial concludes, unless already on bail.
Though the bench of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma noted that " there is no doubt about the fact that one of the objectives behind keeping the approver in custody till the conclusion of trial is to prevent him from the temptation of saving his former friends and companions, by resiling from the terms of grant of pardon”, it clarified that the high court has the authority to order the release of such an approver under appropriate circumstances, utilizing its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
This means that the high court can instruct the release of an approver who has been granted forgiveness under Section 306 CrPC to prevent the misuse of legal proceedings or to uphold justice.
The court deliberated on whether to release Chakraborty, considering judicial discretion, which is crucial for fair decision-making. This involves reviewing facts, legal arguments, and relevant factors comprehensively.
A key consideration was whether Chakraborty, having been granted forgiveness as an approver, should be released. APP Manoj Pant did not object to this, citing Chakraborty's prior truthful statement under Section 164 of CrPC and the ongoing trial.
Additionally, Chakraborty's documented medical condition, which includes significant physical disability and reliance on a wheelchair, was acknowledged, requiring compassionate consideration.
Subsequently, Chakraborty was granted forgiveness under specific conditions, including full disclosure of relevant circumstances, no intentional hiding of essential information, no provision of false testimony, and compliance with all terms of the pardon.
While detaining an approver aims to prevent collusion, it's also recognized that failure to adhere to forgiveness conditions may result in a trial for the original offense and providing false evidence. Chakraborty's previous statement under Section 164 of CrPC would remain admissible if retracted during testimony.
Background:
It was claimed that significant amounts of such funds were received by M/s. PPK Newsclick Studio Pvt. Ltd. Allegedly, Chakraborty, along with others, was a shareholder of the company. Later, Chakraborty challenged the arrest and subsequent remand, which was dismissed. He withdrew the petition against this decision on January 22, 2024. Meanwhile, he sought pardon and permission to become an approver, which was granted on January 6, 2024.
Advocate for Petitioner: Advocates A.S. Kulshrestha and Lalit KumarAdvocates for Respondent: Additional Public Prosecutor Manoj Pant with Standing Counsel Zoheb Hossain and Advocates Akhilesh Pratap Singh, Hina Khan, and Lalit Kumar
Case Title: Amit Chakraborty v State NCT Of Delhi (2024: DHC: 3642)
Please Login or Register
