Read Time: 05 minutes
A plea has been filed before the Delhi High Court against the Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre alleging that the hospital is not complying with the condition of land allotment on institutional (concessional) rates by not providing free treatment to EWS patients. In November, the High Court sought a detailed reply from the DDA on the issue.
The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) in its affidavit before the Delhi High Court has stated that Rajeev Gandhi Cancer Hospital has "breached conditions" of free treatment to the poor in compliance with the condition of allotment of the land to it.
According to the affidavit filed by DDA through Advocate Shobhana Takiar, the allotment letters specifically stated that the clauses of allotment shall include other conditions of allotment and perpetual lease, thereafter, in 1993, mortgage permission was granted to the hospital only with a condition of a limited percentage of free patient treatment to the poor in it.
The DDA stated that the State government as well as the High Court had directed the hospital to comply with free bed norms, i.e. 25% free beds to the weaker sections of the society and free OPD to the indigent patients, but they failed to comply with the terms and conditions of allotment.
A bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad of the High Court in November had directed the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to file an affidavit giving details as to whether the Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre is complying with the condition of land allotment on institutional (concessional) rates with regard to a free treatment of persons from EWS Category.
The plea filed by the Social Jurist, a Civil Rights Group, through Advocate Ashok Agarwal alleged that the hospital is in existence for the last more than two decades and is functioning with 302 beds capacity, however, it has always been violating with impunity the conditions of land allotment with regard to providing free treatment to EWS patients.
It stated, "The respondent hospital has made unwarranted profits during the last two decades by not providing at all free treatment to EWS patients...therefore, it is liable to make good to society by paying such an amount of unwarranted profit to DDA in terms of an earlier decision of the High Court".
The civil rights group has alleged that the inaction on part of the hospital is a blatant violation of the conditions of allotment of public land to it by DDA.
As per the plea, the hospital is run by the Indraprastha Cancer Society & Research Centre, to whom public land was allotted by DDA for the construction of the hospital with a condition that they would provide free treatment to EWS patients to the extent of 10% IPD and 25% OPD.
Case Title: Social Jurist, a Civil Rights Group v. Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre & Ors.
Please Login or Register