Ganesh Chathurthi: Supreme Court to hear challenge against Madras HC order stalling sale of plaster of Paris idols

Read Time: 05 minutes


The High Court had has set aside an order of the single which had allowed sale by the artisans, while putting in place restrictions on immersions


The Supreme Court will hear a plea against the restraint on sale and immersion of Ganesha idols which are made of plaster of Paris in the state of Tamil Nadu at 4 pm today. The idols are immersed as part of the Ganesh Chaturthi festivities on September 19.

A bench of CJI DY Chandrachud, Justices JB Pardiwala & Manoj Misra heard Senior Advocate Shyam Divan who appeared for a manufacturer of Vinayaka idols, challenging a division bench of Madras High Court order of September 17, which had restrained the sale and immersion of Ganesha idols made of plaster of Paris in the state. The order came as an interim stay against a single judge order of September 16, which allowed the sale of such idols, while making alternative arrangements for immersion. 

"How can they ban sale of the work the artisans have done?" the senior counsel said to the CJI led bench.

"Lets hear it at end of board," the CJI agreed.

The idol manufacturer has said that his right to life is affected under Art. 21 of the Constitution of India as the police officers have illegally and without any due notice and procedures u/s 102 Cr.P.C 1973  seized the idols and harassed him and threatened him with dire consequences.

"No report is seemed to have been sent to the Jurisdictional Magistrate regarding the seizure of the property. It is submitted that Plaster of Paris is not an illegal or a banned substance as any of the drugs under the NDPS Act 1985. Hence, the Respondent-State failed to adhere to due process enshrined under the Law and the Constitution of India," he has averred.

The single Judge of the High Court had passed an order permitting the Petitioner to make eco-friendly idols within the rules and regulations while also upholding regulations restricting the immersion of idols that are made of toxic and polluting substances in the river water. However, while relying on NGT guidelines, the division bench stayed the order, after the state preferred an appeal before High Court.

It is the case of the petitioner that the interim order has failed to appreciate the Guidelines of the CPCB so vehemently relied on by the Respondent-State. "The ban extended on Plaster of Paris is not to be confused with manufacture of idols, but only with immersion in the water bodies. Even the recitals prior to Guidelines 2.0, the one titled for manufacturers is concerned with immersion," the manufacturer has said.

Case Title: Prakash Vs. The District Collector and Ors.