Not decent for a CM to use words with hidden meanings: Allahabad HC denies relief to Arvind Kejriwal in inflammatory speech case
Allegedly Kejriwal made a speech in 2014 where he said that the voters of the Congress would be termed as ‘Gaddar of the country’ whereas the voters of the Bhartiya Janta Party would not be pardoned by ‘Khuda'.
The Allahabad High Court on Monday dismissed the plea filed by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal assailing an order of Sultanpur Sessions Court that had rejected his revision application seeking discharge in the 2014 inflammatory speech case.
The allegation against the Chief Minister is that in the run-up to the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, flouting the Model Code of Conduct he made a speech where he said: “Jo Congress ko vote dega, mera manana hoga, desh ke saath gaddari hogi; jo Bhajpa ko vote dega use Khuda bhi muaf nahin karega,” (Who will vote for Congress, I will consider him a traitor to the country; who will vote for BJP, will not be forgiven even by 'Khuda').
Denying the relief as sought by Kejriwal through an application under Section 482 CrPC, the single judge bench of Justice Rajesh Singh Chauhan observed,
"...reasonable restrictions (over freedom of speech and expression) are meant for preserving inter-alia public order, decency or morality. Prima facie, it is not decent for a person, who is the Chief Minister of one State, to utter any sentence or word which has any hidden meaning".
Court held that though Khuda, Bhagwan or God are one and the same, using the word ‘Khuda’ by one Hindu leader only for those voters, who cast their votes to the Bhartiya Janta Party, not to the Congress can only be clarified by the applicant (Kejriwal) during the course of the trial about his intent.
The judge emphasized, "I am unable to comprehend as to how such speech would constitute a propagation of ideas or would have any social value".
Therefore, noting that it had been informed that credible evidences against Kejriwal had been collected during the investigation and the charge sheet had been filed, Court opined that the veracity of charge may not be examined or tested by the High Court by invoking its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
The case against Kejriwal was lodged by Flying Squad Magistrate in 2014 under Section 125 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 at Kotwali Musafirkhana Police Station in Amethi district. After completion of the investigation, the Investigating Officer submitted the charge sheet against Kejriwal and on September 6, 2014, the trial court took cognizance against him and summoned him.
Thereafter, Kejriwal sought exemption of his personal appearance before the trial court which eventually got allowed by the Supreme Court as an interim measure. However, in October 2021, Kejriwal had to appear before the court of Magistrate where he was granted bail in the matter.
Seeking discharge in the case, Kejriwal's counsel argued that Kejriwal neither made any appeal for a vote on the ground of religion etc. nor he promoted enmity between the classes of the people, therefore, he may not be held liable for the offence under Section 125 of the Act, 1951.
He also contended that whatever statement was made by Kejriwal was merely based upon his personal opinion and such statement is protected under Article 19 of the Constitution of India i.e. “Freedom of Speech and Expressions”.
Case Title: Arvind Kejriwal vs Stae of UP and Anr.