Read Time: 04 minutes
"This law has to be implemented throughout the country. We are granting time for conducting the survey within three months and submit report by March 31, 2025..", the bench has said
The Supreme Court recently issued directions for successful implementation of the Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (POSH) Act, 2013.
A bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and N Kotiswar Singh has ordered chief secretaries of all states and union territories to conduct a nation-wide survey to identify the public and private institutions which are yet to set up an internal complaints committee (ICC) for handling complaints of sexual harassment at workplaces.
The bench has further directed that district officers be appointed to coordinate efforts to implement the law through nodal officers for each area or taluk within the district.
Court has therefore directed the States and UTs to appoint an officer in each district by December 31, 2024, who would constitute a local complaints committee by January 31, 2025 and appoint nodal officers at taluka levels.
Additionally, the division bench has also ordered the formation of Internal Complaints Committees (ICCs) for all government departments and public sector undertakings, along with the creation of SheBox portals, a complaint box meant exclusively for women, for nationwide compliance of the POSH Act.
On Tuesday, Advocate Padma Priya who had been appointed as Amicus Curiae, outlined the existing mechanisms under the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA).
Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Aishwarya Bhati highlighted the importance of SheBox portal as a grievance redressal tool, however, she added that private sector organisations were absent from the platform.
In 2023, the top Court had expressed displeasure over the poor implementation of the provisions of the POSH Act and thus, issued some important guidelines for proper implementation of the Act.
“It is quite disquieting to note that there are serious lapses in the enforcement of the Act even after such a long passage of time,” the bench had observed.
Case Title: Aureliano Fernandes vs. State of Goa & Ors.
Please Login or Register