Read Time: 05 minutes
The case against the minister and his wife was registered by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption in 2011.
The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the Tamil Nadu Minister K Ponmudi's conviction in connection with a disproportionate assets case.
A bench of Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan has also suspended the sentence of Ponmudy's wife, P Visalatchi. However, her conviction has not been suspended.
The Madras High Court had convicted Higher Education Minister K. Ponmudy, and his wife P. Visalatchi in a disproportionate assets case In December last year.
A single judge bench of Justice G. Jayachandran held that the trial court had erred in acquitting the accused without analysing the prosecution’s case in the right perspective.
The case against the minister and his wife was registered by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption in 2011. K. Ponmudy was the Minister for Higher Education and Mines in the DMK regime from 2006 to 2011.
According to the prosecution, the accused were charged with accumulating Rs 1.79 crore in wealth that was disproportionate to their documented income sources from April 13, 2006, to March 31, 2010. The couple faced legal action for their inability to provide a satisfactory explanation for this discrepancy.
It was the DVAC's case that as of April 13, 2006, Ponmudy and his wife possessed pecuniary resources and properties valued at approximately Rs 2.71 crore, marking the commencement of the scrutiny period. By the conclusion of the examination on March 31, 2010, the couple was found holding pecuniary resources and properties totaling Rs. 6.27 crore.
Upon scrutinizing the combined income, expenditures, and potential savings of both individuals, the DVAC argued that the accused were found to possess pecuniary resources and properties as of March 31, 2010, amounting to Rs 1.79 crore, which were disproportionate to their documented sources of income.
The agency contended that Ponmudy, as a public servant, violated the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988, specifically under Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(e). Additionally, his wife was accused of abetting and assisting him in obtaining and holding pecuniary resources and properties on his behalf, which were disproportionate to their known sources of income.
In the matter, in 2016, a special court in Villupuram acquitted the duo. Special judge for Prevention of Anti-corruption Act cases T Sundaramoorthy had passed the order.
However, in 2017, the DVAC filed an appeal before the high court, which has now been allowed.
It is noteworthy that as a consequence of this conviction, if the Minister receives more than 6 months jail term, he will lose his ministerial position.
Case Title: K Ponmudi vs. The State of Tamil Nadu
Please Login or Register
