Patanjali Ads| Supreme Court accepts Baba Ramdev, MD Acharya's apology; closes contempt case

Read Time: 05 minutes

Synopsis

On February 27, Court had imposed a ban of advertisements of medicines Ramdev Baba's Patanjali noting that it has been taking the country for a ride by making misleading claims

The Supreme Court has today closed the contempt case it had initiated against Ramdev Baba's Patanjali for misleading advertisements of medicines.

Indian Medical Association (IMA) had filed the instant plea alleging a smear campaign by Ramdev Baba and his company against the COVID-19 vaccination and modern medicine.

Court had in November last year directed Patanjali not to publish false advertisements in the future. The instant proceedings were initiated after Patanjali did not abide by its undertaking not to publish advertisements making false claims about its products and targeting modern medicines and vaccinations.

The Supreme Court had reserved its judgment in the contempt petition filed by Indian Medical Association against Patanjali after it was informed today that original copies of apologies published in newspapers, as directed, had been filed and steps were underway with respect to ads of Patanjali products for which licenses were recently suspended by state authorities.

Recently Supreme court had blasted the official authorities of the State of Uttarakhand for not acting over the misleading advertisements being posted by Patanjali since 2018.

Court had also came down heavily on Baba Ramdev and Balkrishna for not taking the contempt notices issued to them seriously.

"There is a gross violation of the undertaking given to the highest court of the land..you should have made sure that the chain of command should go to the last man..we also can say that we are sorry to accept your apology that your media department is an island..", the bench had said referring to the affidavit filed by Baba Ramdev and Balkrishna saying that the ads were approved by the media department and they were unaware of it.

Earlier, Patanjali Ayurveda had filed an unqualified apology before the Supreme Court of India for issuing misleading advertisements. Submitting that it will ensure that such advertisements are not issued in the future, the affidavit filed through Patanjali's managing Director Acharya Balkrishna adds, "the Deponent begs to submit that its intention is only to exhort the citizens of this country to lead a healthier life by consuming products of the Respondent No. 5 including products for lifestyle ailments through the use of age old literature and materials supplementing and backed by ayurvedic research".

 

Case Title: Indian Medical Association & Anr vs. Union of India and Ors