Plea Before Madras High Court Seeks Initiation of Criminal Contempt Proceedings Against DMK Leader RS Bharathi For Remarks Against Justice Venkatesh

Read Time: 04 minutes

Synopsis

As per the affidavit, on August 24, 2023, during a press briefing, Bharathi went on record accusing the judge of not only practicing selective actions through suo motu revision petition but also imputed malicious intentions to the judge

Before the Madras High Court, a petition has been filed seeking the initiation of criminal contempt proceedings against DMK organization secretary R.S. Bharathi.

The plea has been filed based on Bharathi's accusations against Justice N. Anand Venkatesh of implementing a 'selective approach' in taking up suo motu revisions related to the acquittal or discharge of legislators in disproportionate assets cases.

The plea was mentioned before the division bench of Chief Justice S.V. Gangapurwala and Justice P.D. Audikesavalu by advocate P. Vijendran for urgent hearing for the petition.

However, the bench directed him to submit a written request to the Registrar (Judicial) and assured him that the case would be listed for a hearing within a week provided all necessary documents were in order.

The petition had been jointly filed by A. Shankar, also known as 'Savukku' Shankar, and law student G. Karthi.

In an affidavit filed in the plea, the petitioners asserted that Justice Venkatesh's decision to initiate suo motu revisions of acquittals and discharges involving both current and former Ministers was justified.

They contended that any law-abiding citizen concerned with preserving the rule of law would applaud the High Court's courageous action in recognizing the erosion of the criminal justice system.

As per the affidavit, on August 24, 2023, during a press briefing, Bharathi went on record accusing the judge of not only practicing selective actions through suo motu revision petition but also imputed malicious intentions to the judge.

The petitioners argued that these remarks by the DMK leader had detrimentally affected the public's perception of the judiciary's credibility.

They asserted that such actions warranted stringent action against him under the Contempt of Courts Act.

Case Title: A Shankar and Another v. R.S.Bharathi