Delhi High Court Refuses Fixed Timeline for Shraddha Walkar Murder Case Trial

Delhi High Court refused to expedite the Shraddha Walkar murder trial against Aaftab Poonawalla, observing that the trial court is conducting proceedings on a day-to-day basis.
X

Delhi High Court declined to issue directions for a time-bound conclusion of the Shraddha Walkar murder trial, noting that proceedings are already being conducted on a day-to-day basis

The Delhi High Court recently dismissed a plea seeking a time-bound conclusion to the Shraddha Walkar murder case trial against Aaftab Amin Poonawala, noting that the daily legal proceedings are already progressing rapidly under a day-to-day schedule

The Delhi High Court on Friday declined to issue any further directions for the time-bound conclusion of the trial in the sensational Shraddha Walkar murder case, observing that the trial court is already conducting proceedings on a day-to-day basis and making every effort to conclude the matter expeditiously.

Justice Madhu Jain disposed of a petition filed by Shraddha Walkar's brother, who had sought a fixed timeline for completion of the trial, contending that the prolonged proceedings had prevented the family from performing her last rites as several of her recovered remains continue to be retained as case property.

"No further directions are required to be passed at this stage when the trial is being conducted on a day to day basis. The petition is disposed of," the Court held.

Plea sought fixed timeline for trial

The petition urged the High Court to direct the trial court to conclude the proceedings within a specified timeframe and avoid unnecessary adjournments. It argued that despite the investigation having concluded, charges being framed in May 2023, and substantial progress in recording evidence, the trial has remained pending for over four years.

The petitioner submitted that the delay has caused continuing emotional, psychological and spiritual trauma to the family, which has been unable to perform Shraddha Walkar's funeral rites because her mortal remains continue to be preserved as evidence.

The plea argued that the right to dignity extends beyond death and includes the dignified treatment and disposal of mortal remains. It contended that the continued retention of the remains amounts to an ongoing violation of the family's constitutional rights.

Delhi Police: Trial progressing expeditiously

During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the murder had shocked the conscience of the nation and argued that only 23 witnesses had been examined since 2023, leaving 43 witnesses yet to be examined, which could prolong the trial by another two to three years.

Senior Advocate Amit Prasad, appearing for the Delhi Police, opposed the plea and informed the Court that the trial was progressing steadily.

He submitted that out of 222 prosecution witnesses, 157 have already been examined, while examination-in-chief of six witnesses remains pending. Of these, four are overseas witnesses who are required to be examined through video conferencing.

Prasad further informed the Court that cross-examination of 14 witnesses is pending and that the trial is being conducted on a day-to-day basis except on Saturdays and Sundays.

HC requests expedited faciitation of overseas witnesses

While refusing to issue any further directions to the trial court, the High Court requested the Union Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry of External Affairs to facilitate the examination of overseas witnesses expeditiously whenever the trial court issues appropriate directions in that regard.

Background

Aaftab Poonawalla is accused of murdering his live-in partner Shraddha Walkar in 2022, allegedly chopping her body into multiple pieces and disposing of them over several days in different parts of Delhi.

Charges were framed against Poonawalla in May 2023 for offences relating to murder and destruction of evidence. He pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. The prosecution has cited over 220 witnesses in the case.

It is to be noted that on July 8, a Delhi Court had cancelled a scheduled trial hearing in the Shraddha Walkar murder case on July 20 after the accused, Aaftab Amin Poonawala, sought an exemption from physical production to appear for his university examinations inside the prison.

Poonawala informed the court that he is scheduled to write his final M.A. Sociology examination, conducted by the Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU), on July 20, 2026. According to the application, the examination is slated to take place between 2:00 P.M. and 5:00 P.M. at the IGNOU Exam Centre situated within Central Jail No. 03, Tihar, where he is currently lodged.
Taking note of the examination datesheet, spanning from July 11 to July 20, the court granted the exemption.
"In view of the same, the next date i.e. 20.07.2026 stands cancelled"
ASJ Jaggi stated in the order. The judge further directed that the recording of Prosecution Evidence (P.E.) will resume on July 21, 2026, at 2:00 P.M., clarifying that all other previously fixed dates for the trial will remain unchanged.
Earlier, on May 29, the ASJ Jaggi had directed that the trial will proceed on a day-to-day basis starting July 20. The matter was listed for recording prosecution evidence daily between July 20 and July 25, after which dates for August were to be fixed. The case has been pending since 2023.
On May 9, 2023, a Delhi Court had framed charges of murder and disappearance of evidence against Aftab Amin Poonawala, who is accused of strangling his live-in partner Shraddha Walkar and chopping her body into pieces. Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Manisha Khurana Kakkar of the Saket Court framed charges against Poonawala under Sections 302 (Murder) and 201 (Disappearance of Evidence) of the Indian Penal Code.

Case Title: Shrejay Vikas Walkar v. Aftab Amin Poonawala & Ors.

Bench: Justice Madhu Jain

Hearing Date: July 31, 2026

Tags

Next Story