Plea in SC Seeks FIR Against Justice Yashwant Varma Amid Indictment

In a new development concerning Justice Yashwant Varma, a plea has been filed before the Supreme Court seeking the registration of an FIR against him. This comes in the wake of his indictment following the recovery of large sums of unaccounted cash from his official residence, and the forwarding of an in-house committee report to the President by the outgoing Chief Justice of India.

“Despite the lapse of over a week since the recovery, no FIR has been registered and the criminal law has not been set into motion,” the plea states.

The petitioners have invoked Article 32 of the Constitution, raising concerns over the delay in initiating criminal proceedings and the preservation of crucial evidence.

The plea further asserts that the seized currency, described as "burned, partly burned, and clandestinely removed" is indicative of bribery and corruption, offences punishable under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Pointing out to the Supreme Court's 1991 judgment in K. Veeraswami v. Union of India, which mandates that no criminal case can be filed against a High Court or Supreme Court judge without the consultation of the Chief Justice of India, the plea adds,

"There is no official explanation as to why no FIR was registered. The failure to initiate criminal law proceedings, which would include the seizure of the currency notes and the arrest of suspects, raises grave concerns”

The petition also remarks on how this ruling effectively shields judges, even in cases of severe misconduct. While it acknowledges that most judges are people of "erudition, integrity, learning and independence," the plea stresses that certain recent incidents, such as Justice Nirmal Yadav’s conviction in a bribery case and now the allegations against Justice Varma, show that judicial misconduct cannot be overlooked.

“Judges do not commit crimes. But incidents where judges are caught red-handed accepting money as in the case of Justice Nirmal Yadav, or now Justice Yashwant Varma, cannot be denied,” the plea states.

The said petition comes amidst ongoing scrutiny against Justice Varma who has so far refused to resign despite mounting pressure.

The outgoing Chief Justice of India forwarded the in-house committee report on the matter to the President on May 8, 2025.

“The people of this country expected the police to register an FIR, nay, the Chief Justice to grant permission to the police for registration of the FIR without any further delay,” the plea emphasizes, urging the Court to act swiftly to prevent loss of evidence.

The petition has been filed by Advocate Mathews Nedumpara and three others.