Delhi Excise Policy Case: High Court Defers CBI Plea Against Kejriwal, Sisodia; Hearing on May 4

Delhi High Court bench hearing CBI appeal in excise policy case involving Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia.
X

Delhi High Court adjourns CBI plea against Kejriwal and Sisodia’s discharge in excise policy case; next hearing on May 4

Delhi High Court adjourned the CBI’s plea challenging the discharge of Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and others in the excise policy case after seeking complete trial court records, listing the matter for May 4

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday deferred hearing in the Central Bureau of Investigation’s challenge to the discharge of Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and other accused in the Delhi excise policy case, after noting that the complete trial court record had not yet been received.

Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, who was to hear the matter, directed that the entire record be summoned positively by the next day and adjourned the case for hearing on May 4 at 2:30 PM.

“I have not received the entire record from the trial court. I will hear the matter on Monday,” the Court observed.

At the outset, Advocate Farrukh Khan, appearing in the matter, informed the Court that an interlocutory application had been filed.

Notably, Kejriwal, Sisodia and co-accused had chosen not to appear in person or through counsel during the proceedings.

The Court also recorded that some respondents had already filed their replies and granted a final opportunity to the remaining parties to do so by May 2.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) S. V. Raju and Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) D.P. Singh, were present in court when the matter was taken up.

In a connected development, the Enforcement Directorate’s plea seeking expunction of adverse remarks made by the special judge is also listed for hearing on May 4.

The case pertains to the CBI’s appeal challenging the discharge of the accused in the alleged irregularities surrounding the now-scrapped Delhi excise policy.

What has happened so far:

It is to be noted that Senior AAP leader Manish Sisodia had written to Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the Delhi High Court, stating that he will not participate in further hearings in the matter, citing concerns over the “appearance of impartial justice” and invoking principles of conscience and Satyagraha. Sisodia’s letter follows a similar communication by Arvind Kejriwal a day earlier. Referring to it, Sisodia stated, “I have carefully considered the substance of that letter… I find myself in respectful agreement with the stand taken by him, which is based on Mahatma Gandhi's teachings on Satyagraha.”

Manish Sisodia's recusal case involves a pending criminal revision petition before the Delhi High Court, where he had sought the recusal of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma citing apprehensions of bias. In the same case, Arvind Kejriwal was permitted to argue the recusal plea in person and he had made detailed submissions before the Court.

The High Court, however, rejected the recusal plea, holding that the grounds raised did not justify withdrawal of the judge and cautioning against allegations that could undermine the institution’s integrity if not substantiated.

Following the hearing, videos of Kejriwal’s courtroom arguments surfaced and were widely circulated on social media, triggering a separate controversy over alleged unauthorised recording and dissemination of court proceedings. The same is under consideration before the High Court. It is in this backdrop that after Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and Durgesh Pathak have written to the Court expressing their decision to abstain from further participation in the matter.

Case Title: CBI v. Kuldeep Singh & Ors.

Bench: Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma

Hearing Date: April 29, 2026

Tags

Next Story